Walker and his colleagues note that, at this time, only those
who began antiviral treatment during acute infection and show
signs of anti-HIV immune system activity have been able to go
on to control virus without drugs. Studies in persons who first
start HAART 6 months or more after infection - the majority of
infected persons - are yet to be done.
Eric Rosenberg, MD, the paper's lead author, says, "While we're
confident that someday we will be able to apply these finding
to treatment of chronic HIV infection, there's a lot more we need
to learn about augmenting the immune system's response against
HIV. We also owe a huge vote of thanks to these patients who are
pioneers in what could have been a risky venture."
The current findings are an extension of a 1997 report in Science
from the same team. That study found that starting HIV-infected
individuals on antiviral treatment when they exhibit signs of
acute infection - flu-like symptoms that appear within weeks of
exposure to virus - both causes a drastic drop in the levels of
virus in the blood and induces production of T helper cells specifically
targeted against HIV.
T helper cells are the "generals" of the immune system, calling
into play and directing the activity of T killer cells (also called
cytotoxic T lymphocytes or CTLs). Individual T helper cells are
targeted against the specific antigen signatures of viruses and
bacteria, and when helper cells encounter their specific antigens,
they become activated and quickly expand in number. Because HIV
attacks activated T helper cells, it kills off the very cells
that should coordinate the body's antiviral defences, and as a
result people with HIV usually have few or no HIV-specific T helper
cells.
However, a small number of HIV-infected individuals have remained
healthy for years without drug treatment, and Walker's team found
that these so-called long-term nonprogressors appear naturally
to produce high levels of HIV-specific T helper cells. They went
on to show that people treated at the acute stage of infection
exhibited a very similar response, producing significant levels
of HIV-specific T helper cells that seem necessary to keep the
virus in check. Treatment with the drug cocktail appears to protect
the T helper cells from becoming infected when they are activated
in response to their first encounters with the virus.
But the 1997 study left open the question of whether early treatment
could truly duplicate the long-term progressor phenomenon, in
which the virus is controlled by the immune system alone. To test
that hypothesis, the research team developed the current study
led by Rosenberg. In the pilot phase of the study, one patient
with a strong HIV-specific T helper cell response after early
antiviral treatment volunteered to discontinue therapy. His viral
levels soon rose above 10,000, the point at which the study protocol
required reinstatement of treatment, and viral levels dropped
again after therapy was resumed. However, when the patient had
to discontinue treatment again because of an unrelated infection,
his virus levels first rose to almost 40,000 but then dropped
within 6 days to less than 500. The patient resumed antiviral
therapy after recovery from his illness, but once again discontinued
several months later. This time the increase in virus levels was
less than in the earlier treatment interruptions and was followed
by a rapid drop to less than 5,000, the level at which treatment
is usually recommended. The patient maintained a low viral level
- with one transient increase associated with a sore throat -
for 130 days until he chose to resume therapy.
Based on this result, the research team enrolled eight patients
in a revised study protocol, which required reinstatement of therapy
if viral levels either stayed above 5,000 for 3 weeks or rose
to 50,000 at any point. Viral levels on all patients rose within
17 days, but levels on three patients soon dropped below 5,000.
Two of those patients have stayed off therapy and currently have
viral levels below 200 after 9 to 11 months off therapy. The third
patient chose to resume therapy after 3 months, even though his
viral level never exceeded 5,000. He discontinued again about
3 months later and currently has a viral load below 300 more than
9 months into the second discontinuation.
In the other five participants, viral levels exceeded the established
limits during the initial discontinuation, and treatment resumed.
Levels of CTLs rose for all five following reinstatement of treatment,
so they chose to stop drugs a second time. Their viral levels
rose again but soon dropped below 5,000. Two of those patients
remain off treatment with current viral levels between 200 and
300 after 8 and 9 months. Two other patients in this group chose
to restart therapy after 4 and 5 months, although their viral
levels did not require resumption. Only one patient was required
to resume therapy when his viral level exceeded 5,000 for three
weeks after about 5 months off therapy.
"Even
if the viral loads on these patients rise tomorrow, we've shown
that it is possible for the immune system to suppress HIV, something
many believed could not be done," Walker says. "Not only does
this result open the door to investigating immunotherapies for
HIV, but the same strategy also may be applied to other chronic
viral infections, like hepatitis C, that currently escape immune
system control." The data also supports efforts to find and treat
patients with acute HIV infection.
Several key questions remain to be addressed in future studies:
how long antiviral therapy should continue before discontinuation
is attempted, how long the viral suppression might be expected
to continue, and whether any factors might predict who would or
would not be successful with this treatment strategy. And beyond
those questions lies the larger one of how this or other immune
system based approaches can be applied to those not treated early
in their infection.
Other
co-authors of the Nature paper are Marcus Altfeld, MD; Samuel
Poon; Mary Phillips, RN; Barbara Wilkes, Robert Eldridge, Gregory
Robbins, MD; Richard D'Aquila, MD; and Philip Goulder, MD, PhD,
all of the Partners AIDS Research Center and the MGH Infectious
Disease Division. The study was supported by grants from the National
Institutes of Health, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, the German Academic
Exchange Program, the UK Medical Research Council, and several
private donors.
Note:
This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Massachusetts
General Hospital for journalists and other members of the public.
If you wish to quote from any part of this story, please credit
Massachusetts General Hospital as the original source. Story taken
from Science Daily, www.sciencedaily.com.
Next - Back
to Immune System Boosting Research